• Rose and Rose Solicitors

Tycoon must share £130 million fortune with ex-wife



Those who fail to cooperate in divorce proceedings may get away with it for a while, but they will ultimately be made to pay for their recalcitrance. In one case, an international business tycoon who dragged his feet was ordered to hand over almost half of his £130 million fortune to his ex-wife.


The couple, aged in their 70s, had been married for 46 years before the husband divorced the wife by pronouncing 'Talaq', and the divorce was subsequently confirmed by a Sharia court in the United Arab Emirates. During their marriage, the husband had enjoyed enormous success as a hotelier, financier and property developer. The wife had lived in London since their separation and launched proceedings in England under the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.


The husband disputed that the English courts had jurisdiction to consider the wife's claim on the basis that she was habitually resident in Portugal. He had been ordered to pay maintenance and legal costs to his wife but had fallen £740,000 into arrears. Due to his lack of cooperation, a worldwide injunction had been issued against him, freezing his assets up to a value of £125 million.


In accepting jurisdiction to hear the case, the High Court noted that the wife had been living in London for two years since the separation. The couple had lived in England earlier in their marriage; both had permission to remain permanently in the UK and the wife was eligible for naturalisation as a British citizen.


Due to the husband's failure to participate in the proceedings, the Court had to take a rough and ready approach to valuing the marital assets. It put their worth at just under £130 million, of which the wife was entitled to a sum in excess of £61 million. After such a long marriage, there could be no serious argument that the sharing principle should not be applied. The Court noted that the husband had been given every opportunity to be heard and, due to his unhelpful attitude, could not complain that the assets had been overvalued or that the award to the wife was overgenerous.


In almost all cases, being uncooperative will lead to a worse result than a considered attempt to achieve an appropriate settlement at the outset. For advice on any aspect of family breakdown and financial arrangements on divorce, contact one of our Family Law team.


Please note we are unable to offer legal aid.

0 views

Our useful documents, click to view

If you have difficulty with mobility we can arrange to see you outside the office where there is ease of access or even at your home 

© Rose & Rose. All rights reserved. Registered Office: The Riverside Centre, 40 High Street, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 1HL 

London, Tower Hill: 1 St Katharine's Way, St Katharine's & Wapping, London E1W 1UN

Rose & Rose LLP t/a Rose & Rose (Company no. OC363353)

VAT Number: GB 928 5154 08

Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

SRA ID: 559162